JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

10/18/2014 7:02:24 PM
1
Except that Bungie didn't plan Halo 4 or Halo 5 as they completed halo development work with Reach. Had the blueprinted some of the IP being used by 343 for the 2nd trilogy in the "Halo Bible?" Maybe, but to make a statement that the core elements of Destiny were being developed for a yet to be released game 6 years ago couldn't possibly be true unless Halo 5 ends up being Duke Nukem Forever
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by THE ACTI0N MAN: 10/18/2014 7:48:01 PM
    It was planned, how else do you explain the Destiny poster in ODST? They planned ahead, Bungie left (some stayed and formed 343). Both used the early plans. It's why Halo 5 "Guardians" is an open world shooter -because that was the plan.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by In2morrowsEyes: 10/19/2014 1:48:37 AM
    Just goes to show people will go to no ends to draw up support for their conclusions... That "Destiny Poster" does nothing more than refer to the word destiny and while the white circle could be the Traveler it could also be the moon. Did some of the concepts for Destiny exist at the time ODST was developed? Probably but the idea that Bungie would take 5 years to recycle story elements or character concepts from the most valuable sci-fi IP since Star Wars is laughable at best. This game steals more from Firefly than it does from Halo!

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon