{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/29/2016 2:40:21 AM
1
Then what would be the reason to choose it over a weapon that kills instantly ?
English
-
I'ma need a little more context as to what you are inferring.
-
Why main an accurate hand canon over a sniper ? Why use an auto rifle over a shotgun ?
-
Why main anything personally? It'd be better to be fluent with all weapons types that are all exceptionally lethal within their own rights. I don't see your point.
-
Because one is clearly better than the other ? This does not apply to me But people who play this are overly sweaty and play to win not to have fun
-
So what's the point of your comments then in response to [quote]Buffing doesn't just mean damage only.[/quote] which was used in description to buffing primary weapons. Because you seem to be thinking something completely different.
-
While a buff to weapons ranges, stability, and accuracy would be nice It doesn't change the fact that weapons that kill much much faster are always readily available Buffs would be nice, but it wouldn't change how the game is played
-
They'd at least provide a strong incentive to use the primaries. I really hate weak weapons due to my Battlefield Hardcore mode background.
