JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

9/14/2015 6:07:07 PM
1
Well I would argue thats nostalgia. And considering the average age of a Rolling Stone reader and a Rolling Stone writer those numbers make sense. Also, nothing to do with my point.
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by Der Sheff: 9/14/2015 6:20:09 PM
    Rolling Stone's the magazine, not the band. They take in to account replay requests. Classic rock is flat out better than anything put out, today. Sorry, bud.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Also, replay requests? Based on what, radio? You mean that out dated technology used primarily by... older people?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by Der Sheff: 9/14/2015 6:38:05 PM
    I see what you're saying: out with the old and in with the new. Otherwise we would see more songs from the 1600's or prior. Matter of taste. Perhaps the top 500 was a poor reference. Still, I would say classic rock has yielded the best music ever, in the sense that what you had recorded was what you had live and without some sort of auto tuning.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Are you -blam!-ing kidding me? How could you misconstrue my response as thinking I was talking about the -blam!-ing band?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon