{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/6/2015 3:19:24 PM
1
You can go on thinking that, that's fine, but it's not the same.
English
-
If I can go on thinking the truth what Is the pint of your reply? If that's the case why not just drop it? Obviously you still wanted to convince me.
-
I did drop it with my last comment. You're wrong, but don't get it. So, what IS the point? I was mostly just trying to back the other person who is correct.
-
But you just commented again so you did not drop it, you do still care about getting the point across tho it may be wrong.
-
You're still wrong. You really can't use hung seem you talk about a persons death by hanging. Past/present tense is still the same. "Someone will be hanged" and "someone was hanged." People are never hung. It just doesn't work that way. Welcome to the English language.
-
It works that way you just don't wanna except the fact that your "correction was pointless due to that it could go either way hung is just the past tense a and yes you could say hanged in past tense but it isn't correct, it's improper.
-
I will not "accept" that because it's not right. There is no source that will prove your argument. Just illiterate people who might try to back you.
-
Edited by Aeromatica: 2/6/2015 3:50:58 PMYou don't have a source to back up you either, that source you sited proved nothing whatsoever I could find a source.
-
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/hang Here you go. Your turn.
-
How about Webster? That seems like a pretty good source.
-
You asked me questions. So, I answered them. Have I tried to teach you anything in my last couple comments? Nope and now I'm done. You can have the last word. Go for it.
-
And another comment I don't tho I you know the definition of dropping it. You said you were dropping it but you keep replying.
-
What? You admit defeat?
