His statement:[quote]noone likes snitches[/quote] My statement: 42 likes [b]42!=0[/b] (true) [b]42>0[/b] (true) Math computes. Simple. You should try it some time.

Math isn't needed in a debate. Only a good argument, something you lack. Unfortunately.

[b]Logic [/b]is. Which is part of Mathematics. Something you can only dream of. Fortunately.

It's amusing to find a fellow human being basking in the amount of likes he has on a forum post. What really fascinates me would be the ignorance of the comments. Do those not count towards your argument? I mean, mathematically the comments are on average much more negative towards your outlook of this situation. I only ask because i would assume this is logical in your eyes. Right? You wouldn't cherrypick or use a double standard right? Because those arnt logical. And you sir, are a man of logic.

My illogical but at least borderline understandable friend, for this fine passage of reasoning-attempt you deserve an answer that will immediately rank up your Bright-level.. [quote]What really fascinates me would be the ignorance of the comments.[/quote] Here the Logical outcome is [quote]true[/quote]. The posts in this thread that oppose my thesis are overwhelmingly negative and overwhelmingly ignorant. You yourself are a fine Paradigm for this low Quality of Thinking&Arguing, if I may be so free to compliment you on that. [quote] I mean, mathematically the comments are on average much more negative towards your outlook of this situation [/quote] Now follow me in the realms of probability. How probable is it that all the Lowbrains and Glitchers that hate my threads with passion, want me to get lost and blabla would downvote my threads? I would say 95%, the 5% that are just too demented to understand the concept of up-versus-down-vote are surely in the minority. Since we have alone 100 Wannabee Alpha Glitch Predators that are vocal about me being the Bane of their Glitch-Existence, we can assume that they downvoted me 95 times, if I subtract the 5 that were too dumb for even dwonvoting. We have [b]-90[/b]. Now how comes that despite all this negativity the thread is atm at 46+? Because at least 136 people (-90+46) agree with my arguments so complete, that they don`t even feel the need to add something. They have better things to do, since "Not Glitching Crota" requires some time and concentration. So you see where your attempt to "battle me with my own weapons" just shows that you are trying to hold the hate hidden behind a facade of decency, which will now -after I disconnected your arguments and took my logical Sword to take revenge for Ol´Crota- immediately crumble and you will start to flame.

Name-calling and flaming isnt my forte kid. This example you gave was to just fill the gap of what youd say would be a pragmatic assumption. The assumption that people would hate enough to downvote and upvote asweel as make the comments. But i as an example only comment and do not like/dislike posts. I upvoted your post but im commenting against you. What does that make of me? Mute? Down the middle? Neither for or against? A zero? Well obviously my comments have some value if the OP is reaponding to me. A flawed perception of the situation you carry sir. Likes cant compare to comments. Which is why its useless to argue that the more likes you have, the more objective your claim is.

[quote] But i as an example only comment and do not like/dislike posts. I upvoted your post but im commenting against you. What does that make of me?[/quote] "Says that he doesn`t down/upvote" "Claims to have upvoted my post" "Comments against me" You are one of the 5% I mentioned above, simple as that. Or you are one that flips a coin that tells him if he should up/downvote and then doesn`t (because he remembered that he doesn`t vote,), either way I perfectly captured your fuzzy-logic with the Number Example I gave. btw: If you you would have read any of my other threads on [url=http://www.bungie.net/en/Forum/Topics/0/Default/None/bullshit]#Bullshit[/url] you would have seen your faux-pas in this sentence: [quote]Name-calling and flaming isnt my forte [b]kid[/b][/quote] You could only have made yourself sounding more "Passive-aggressive" by starting your sentence with [quote]Lol, name -calling and flaming isn`t my forte, kiddo[/quote]

The hostility you sense is null. If kid had a negative connotation then my psn username would be an insult unto myself. The example- the variables are reflected upon your examples, which are illogical. Simply stated a point that the status of your likes are invalid due to the cause that likes and comments arn't stemmed to the same system of which you rate your post. If i post a topic about how -blam!- is bad and it isnt upvoted. That doesnt mean everyone here is s rapist. It means we lack the effort to voice our opinions on the matter or choose to not interact with the topic. The voting pool isnt solid enough for there be a popular vote. Too many variables. Which is why i see your argument of likes, void.

Now you are loosing it, my man ;-) (Not the argument, that one got lost by you 2 posts in the past already)

Dude, I just want psn up. :/

I feel exploited by you, as a "Cant Play Destiny"-extra. Reported.