So I took some things I learned in geometry and put them together only to have them contradict each other.
So this is what I did...
By definition, a square is a rhombus and a rectangle soooo...
Square=rhombus
And
Square=rectangle
But, by substitution property, you can substitute rectangle for square since square=rectangle soooo....
Rectangle=rhombus
But by definition they are different. How can they be equal????
-
Edited by H2O: 12/23/2014 7:24:27 AMThey aren't equivalent. Every square is a rhombus and every square is a rectangle, but not every rhombus is a square and not every rectangle is a square. Thus: Rectangle =/= Square Rhombus =/= Square Rectangle =/= Rhombus
-
A square is a rectangle but a rectangle is not a square, darn you! I... Think... I dont remember much from geometry... Something like that though.
-
OP is retard
-
Fuсk geometry. Always hated it.