Allow me to explain my point.
First off I apologize for the all Caps title, but that seems to be the only way to get attention nowadays.
People (Myself included) have been complaining about the quality of the content that was in the Dark Below and how little we get for our $20.
In turn numerous people across the forum have responded with an extremely similar argument. An argument that I will now sum up to best of my abilities.
[quote]ITS NOT ABOUT THE QWALITY OF THE CONTINT BRUH, ITS ABOUT HOW MUCH TIME I CAN SPEND PLAYING IT. YEAH ITS $20 BUT I COULD GET 20+ HOURS OF GAMEPLAY OUT OF IT[/quote]
So we have established that the QUANTITY of hours that content can provide outweighs the QUALITY that the content consists of. So by that logic alone it means that World of Warcraft and Call of Duty are the greatest games in history. I mean how many games can compare to the sheer number of hours played that these games have provided?!?
Because obviously regardless of the QUALITY of their respective content its overshadowed by the QUANTITY of hours that their content can bring.
TL;DR
Please use actual logic when arguing your points because it is woefully easy to take incredibly ignorant logic like that I demonstrated above and make it into an absolute farce.
You wanna defend your viewpoint? Thats fine.
Just don't behave like an imbecile in the process.
-
The amount of hours you spend playing a game is 100% dependant on YOUR INDIVIDUAL OPINION of the quality of the game. If you like it and thinks it's good you'll play it to death, even a game like COD with only 8 hours story and just the same PVP games time and time again. But if you don't like it you won't play it, you wouldn't care if the story mode took a good 100 hours to complete plus 100 more on side missions and multiplayer, you just wouldn't play it. So yea I guess you can judge the quality of a game on the hours played to an extent but it's all a matter of personal opinion really.