I saw this and was a little taken aback by it. Looking at the comments, people were also feel similar emotions. So I want to ask the flood a question.
In this situation, where prankers are pranking people in the hood by asking them if they want to buy a gun, only to be a squirt gun, if, like shown in the last clip, these prankers were to get shot, or killed from doing these pranks, who is to blame, in your opinion?
While I know you might automatically say the prankers, but think about it, I'm going to play the devil's advocate in this situation, where the fact that this hostile mentality exists in the hood, do you think a normal, law-abiding citizen shoots somebody who offers to sell them a gun, should they not be blamed because they were simply antagonized?
-
They're idiots. They purposefully go into this place and do things that could put their lives in danger.
-
Edited by TheDustMan77: 11/12/2014 2:32:30 AMToo be honest, it is the prankers fault. They knew they were going into a rough neighborhood, and what they were doing was most likely going to get them injured. Although they might not have known they were going to get shot, they should've known it was going to get them injured, or at the very least, threatened.
-
Both are at fault
-
He got you in a joke let's shoot him for it.....no that just sounds stupid theres no reason to be THAT upset to begin with
-
The people getting pranked. That's no reason to be hostile at all.
-
No it's pretty simple you can't kill people cos they pissed you off doesn't matter where it is, can't physically harm them either. Cyclist piss me off I'd love nothing more than to drive my car though a pack of them then reverse back over them but I can't it's murder and wrong
-