{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/8/2014 3:44:45 PM
1
Seperation of church and state. Marriage is a religious ceremony and you can't force religions to accept people under the first amendment. Call it a civil union which is the same thing but not religious.
English
-
[quote]Marriage is a religious ceremony[/quote]No it isn't. Nonreligious people get married all the time... [quote] you can't force religions to accept people under the first amendment[/quote]And I'm not saying they need to. Equal treatment under the law is what we're talking about. Churches are private organizations that can deny a marriage service to anyone.
-
No, they get civil unions or (lip-service)convert .Right. Give em benefits and all but all Justice of the Peace"weddings" get called civil unions for all people.
-
But why? If they get all the same things, why should they have to call it something else?
-
Marraige=Religion Civil Union=Secular. Simple and applies to all, not a specific group.
-
Why not just let everyone get married? If we adopt your model, what happens if someone converts religions, or stops being religious? Does their marriage status change?
-
You just trying to be ridiculous, now. As a legal status, no.
-
No answer? Gotcha.
