{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/20/2014 10:55:15 PM
1
Give up, that guy wants to hear that hunters are best in pvp and pve. They are squishy as -blam!- in comparison to warlock and titan.
English
-
If I'm "that guy", no I don't want to hear that hunter is best for PVP and PVE. That isn't a very accurate statement. No class is better for pvp or pve vs. another class. Like i said above its about the player not the class.
-
Edited by EisennFaust: 10/21/2014 9:43:44 PMThat's not how "MMO" or "Classes" are built. The Hunter is built for PvP, but the player can make the Class excel in PvE The Titan is built for PvE, but the player can make the class excel in PvP The Warlock (seems to be) built as a mix of PvE and PvP, but the player can make them excep in both. Armor rating is not a part of Crucible, however it is a part of PvE, and in PvE a Titan's armor rating and subclass armor-boost will exceed a Hunter's. The same applies to the Warlock. However a Hunter's subclass agility will always exceed a warlock's or a titan's Hunters are not built for PvE, Titans are not built for PvP. Their abilities can simply be applied to the opposite of what seems to have been intended.
