{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/20/2014 9:15:23 PM
2
Uhh...yes.
There's a reason you see more hunters in PvP, why the top pvpers are hunters, and why hunters are being phased out of vog use.
Titans are terrible at Pvp as their abilities are more PvE focused.
Warlocks are in the middle.
English
-
Wrong. On so many levels. Hunters have a place in VoG. Just some bad kids who blame their lack of skill on everyone else. I am a hunter and can run through it with little problem.
-
I can run the vog fine. But come next patch hunters wont be as useful in the vog as a warlock or titan. They wont be detrimental, but they definetly wont be prefered. Their supers just aren't useful enough to warrant them being chosen over a Warlock who can auto revive, or a Titan who can put up a shield, the arc blade ability does not assist during the boss waves, and the icebreaker can easily replace a hunter's golden gun. They also dont have a higher armor capability than the warlocks or titans, making them generally squishier.
-
Dude i do more than my fair share most the time in PVE and if a hunter is using blade dancer in VOG they're stupid and need to stop using a hunter.
-
Ooonce again. I'm not saying hunters are BAD. I'm saying they're more squishy than the other two classes, as the other two classes have defensive supers/abilities, whilst the hunter seems to be more focused on damage/assault abilities. Which is why I say they're better in PvP, but not as good in PvE. Once again. Hunters are not bad. They just seem more attack focused when compared to the defense-focused Titan and the inbetween Warlock.
-
Im guessing you've never played a hunter. Hunters squishy? Pftt naw. It's all on the player not the class.
-
I've seen every class perform well in the crucible, as well as every class perform well in raids, strikes, etc..
-
Edited by EisennFaust: 10/20/2014 10:13:18 PMI'm mainly speaking in terms of the lone-wolf esque hunters, or the ones who shift forwards expecting to wipe enemies easily in the Vog. Of course there are good and great hunters, who excel at the VoG, but theres a larger majority of -bad- hunters. Just as there's a larger list of -bad- Titans amd Warlocks.
-
Give up, that guy wants to hear that hunters are best in pvp and pve. They are squishy as -blam!- in comparison to warlock and titan.
-
If I'm "that guy", no I don't want to hear that hunter is best for PVP and PVE. That isn't a very accurate statement. No class is better for pvp or pve vs. another class. Like i said above its about the player not the class.
-
Edited by EisennFaust: 10/21/2014 9:43:44 PMThat's not how "MMO" or "Classes" are built. The Hunter is built for PvP, but the player can make the Class excel in PvE The Titan is built for PvE, but the player can make the class excel in PvP The Warlock (seems to be) built as a mix of PvE and PvP, but the player can make them excep in both. Armor rating is not a part of Crucible, however it is a part of PvE, and in PvE a Titan's armor rating and subclass armor-boost will exceed a Hunter's. The same applies to the Warlock. However a Hunter's subclass agility will always exceed a warlock's or a titan's Hunters are not built for PvE, Titans are not built for PvP. Their abilities can simply be applied to the opposite of what seems to have been intended.
