{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by SerpentVI:
10/13/2014 1:00:55 AM
2
There was nothing wrong with the Mass Effect ending. Only babies that can't comprehend sacrificing oneself for the greater good. In chaos there is opportunity for change. For change to happen sometime a sacrificial lamb is needed. Also not all actions ends with change. Bioware was stupid to remake the ending.
English
-
Edited by Neeeewah: 10/13/2014 1:25:54 AMI still chose to die even after the change. It seemed right after everything Shepard went through. Always throwing caution to the wind to save people that never seemed at care. But destiny needs to change
-
Yes Destiny does however using Mass Effect as an example was a poor one. Destiny right now is like a sieve minus any solid substance.
-
i never played ME3, i want to pay it to see what the fuss is about, but the point is Bioware listened to the fans and made the change for free.
-
There is a point were changing art is blasphemous. Bioware was stupid to please the masses for not comprehending a philosophical ending(s).
-
yeah you make a good point but when you're making a video game for people to play, you SHOULD be making it for them imo. you want to make something people will enjoy and buy ultimatly.
-
Actually most game developers make games THEY like and want to play and just hope some of teh players will enjoy it too. It is not meant soley for the players to enjoy it and control how it goes.
-
to each their own, people make games for multiple reasons, i was just saying in my opinion if i were to make a game i'd want to make a game that people will enjoy and if i -blam!-ed up i'd want to fix it. ( and by -blam!- up i obviously mean the lack of a stroy )
