{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by MakeAWishKid909:
10/1/2014 12:47:43 PM
401
Serious question Here...If you could replace Activision With another Corporation what will it be?
If you could take Activision out of the creation of destiny but leave bungie in it... Who would you put in Activisions spot?
-
As long as it isn't Ea, all is well lol. EA would drive Bungie to their grave.
-
Bethesda
-
Bioware or bethesda
-
Edited by MotorboatGalore: 10/1/2014 5:43:22 PMTake Two
-
Edited by FrenchFries: 10/1/2014 5:38:18 PMUbisoft
-
In this order: 1. Microsoft (Personal bias) 2. Bethesda (Story telling element would be second to none) 3. 2k (Face scans for guardians)
-
Well you would have to replace Activision with another publisher...
-
Edited by Fox: 10/1/2014 5:54:32 PMI doubt whether any other publisher would've taken the massive gamble that Activision took or even had the same resources to do so other than EA. Oh, and Microsoft, but wouldn't that be counterproductive? And that's not to say I'd prefer either of those.
-
Micheal bay
-
Bethasda
-
Bethesda!
-
1 ReplyElectronic Arts
-
Big Bertha.
-
3 RepliesMicrosoft. Destiny would have been right up there with Halo.
-
4 RepliesSony. They are willing to take risks when it comes to games.
-
1 Reply
-
1 ReplyMicrosoft Studios. Yes I know that if it was exclusive people would rage but honestly MS Studios would have been the best fit for Destiny.
-
Microsoft for sure
-
Bungie worked its best when they were with Microsoft Publishing Studios. IMO
-
2 RepliesEdited by R34V3R1: 10/1/2014 1:09:58 PMBungie standalone <3
-
Bioware
-
1 ReplyApple
-
Bethesda for sure! Turn this game into a masterpiece!
-
Bethesda
-
EA "Trololololololo"
-
Most definitely Bethesda.
