If you could take Activision out of the creation of destiny but leave bungie in it... Who would you put in Activisions spot?
-
Bethesda for sure then konami
-
Gearbox
-
Bethesda or Bioware
-
Gearbox/2K
-
Edited by EwokSithLord: 10/1/2014 7:45:10 PMGearbox/2k. Hands down.
-
Self published or back with Microsoft. They don't have to do Halo anymore. Microsoft can treat them like Sony does with Naughty Dog.
-
Infinity ward isn't the publisher
-
Edited by NATH-DOG: 10/1/2014 8:00:58 PMActivision = craptivision
-
Trion...... Because Definace...... AWESOME!
-
-
Bethesda
-
Bethesda all the way
-
Bethesda and it's not even close.
-
-
The old Westwood Studios FTW!
-
Mojang. anybody? No? Didnt think so
-
I would have chosen Sony Online Entertainment. Then I would have made it available only on next gen consoles. It would have been the first time a first party company makes a third party type game. I really believe that Sony would have let Bungie do what they wanted from beginning to end.
-
Did you notice you name developers NOT publishers. No? Come back when you think of something different besides EA and Activision.
-
Honestly, I say none. Publishers in video games are like record labels in the music industry. They hold the money card. In the end they make the final call. Many people are yelling at bungie, but I have my crosshairs on Activision. Keep in mind, even though Microsoft published on the platforms, bungie was essentially independent in developing Halo. The results speak for themselves. If this is a 500 million dollar AAA game, bungie should have just kick started/crowd funded and published independently without Activision's chokehold to cash in on dlc.
-
SkyNet
-
Walmart.
-
EPIC [GoW 1-3 version] BLACK TUSK.
-
New line cinema.
-
Infinity Ward? Are you trying to replace Activision or Bungie?
-
Pixar Animation!
-
Why the hell is a Developer (infinity Ward) up there?