If you could take Activision out of the creation of destiny but leave bungie in it... Who would you put in Activisions spot?
-
They should have self-published. It would have been hard, but they had the fan-base to do it.
-
Bethesda, or whoever made borderlands. Gear box I think
-
Bethesda.
-
I'm def going with Bethesda... I can only dream of the wealth of content they would fill this already awesome game with... It doesn't need to be fallout or elder scrolls but I mean I like some meat on the bone! Grimoire Lore is great but it really should have been in an added menu in the game.
-
Bethesda
-
They shouldn't have joined with anybody. They had plenty of money after halo and I think made an awsome choice going away from Microsoft. But call me a fan boy or whatever but I have a fleeting thought that it was activation that cut all the good story that could have been in the campaign and made the rest of the game all dlc
-
They should of stayed with microsoft
-
Comcast Muhahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaa
-
If you say EA than you would have to pay for packs that contain loot and even then you woul probably never get an exotic until you spend like $50
-
2K Games
-
Infinity ward is owned by Activision....
-
Blizzard
-
Really though that poll IS invalid given that you didn't list a single publisher yet are talking about a publisher switch.
-
-
You put developers in place for a publishing company... You might want to fix your logic there. You can't have two developers and no publisher, it just doesn't work like that.
-
Square Enix would of been the best choice.
-
Bioware, they have expieriance with mass effect
-
Bethesda, they have all the experience they need with this sort of game.
-
This guy clearly doesn't know the difference between a developer and a publisher
-
Valve. Every other answer is FACTUALLY incorrect. [spoiler]or just give it to Masahiro Sakurai. The guy that made Super Smash Bros.[/spoiler]
-
-
Bethesda
-
Bethesda
-
Arena net
-
FedEx or Lululemon
-
Take Two