We all know about the huge controversy to do with Destiny, and how it was released. A lot of us know how apparently in the last year of development, the entire game got a 100% story change, causing the entire game to essentially change. A lot of us know of the apparent original story, consisting of Crow and his group for Ghost-less Guardians, and The Traveler bringing the darkness, and how that was the story we were shown. We all know about the clear anger and unhappiness thoughout the community, with how the story was handled, and how the DLC has been handled as well. What I want to know, from you guys, though, is who you think is to blame? Was it Activision and their 'Money-grabbing" schemes? Was it Bungie with its in house conflict with how the higher-ups apparently didn't think that there would be enough players enjoying a highly story driven, filled with cinematic game? Was it both of them simultaneously? Or was it neither of them, and it all came down to people like the Consumer for putting to much trust in both companies, or the Critics, for being so harsh with the game's reviews? The game has phenomenal gameplay, and it makes me really upset what the story could have been, the one story we were hoping for and planing on playing. In my honest opinion (just my own) I honestly feel like it was Activision to blame, pressuring Bungie to make a game that got a score of 90 or above, and how they handle DLCs, and make everything related to money, rather than putting love and feel into the development of the game.