{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/16/2014 3:26:27 PM
8
No Man's Sky Players Would Need 5 Billion Years to Explore Every Planet for 1 Second
I really want to be excited for this game, but am growing increasingly skeptical...
-
You can also theoretically explore minecraft forever, but it's likely to get stale after a while. I hope that it's got enough depth to be worth exploring, simply dumping yourself on a new rock for 10 minutes while you look at the corpses of all the creatures some dickhead wiped out before you arrived there.... that wouldn't be too fun.
-
Eh. This doesn't even remotely excite me. It's called a RNG, and it's used to create random landscapes. Repeat a few billion times and hey, you have a rubbish marketing tool to build hype with! Blizzard could probably claim that in the most technical of senses, Diablo 2 has 'billions' of maps (though I'd hope this game has a slightly more sophisticated RNG than Diablo 2 did).
-
Isn't it the same with Elite Dangerous? I think that game has like five billion star systems.
-
Edited by CarefreeMeat: 8/17/2014 12:39:42 PMI've always been skeptical about this game. /Hipster
-
My interest in this wore off over half a year ago.
-
Doesn't really mean much. Could be the same as every planet with slight variations. Also, exploring just for the sake of exploring isn't really that interesting.
-
My hype for this game is being rapidly replaced with skepticism.
-
After Sony's e3 conference I couldn't have been more excited for this game. As time goes on, I just get more and more skeptical. As if it were a Peter Molyneux game.
