{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/10/2014 3:21:55 PM
1
The one I'm doing now (well I just started) is:
~p v q, (q v s) > ((r > s) > t), p | (r > s) > t
Just gotta prove it using natural deduction
English
-
Well, good luck with that! :D
-
I can't do it >_<
-
You can do it! I believe! :D
