{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/4/2014 9:03:23 PM
1
-
I don't see the differences in the consoles. They're both confirmed to have Destiny at 1080p 30fps. Both having layoffs. Indie games don't matter as they are all mostly on the PC anyways. Both have great exclusives, which means that sales numbers don't affect these two systems that much. Both will grow immensely in the next year. I have both consoles and I don't see why not to play on either one. Ps4 has PS Now, which isn't good. It's anywhere from $3-5 for four hours of playing. Xbox has the Ea Access for $5 a month, but has too few games as of right now. In my opinion, just go where your friends are. ^_^
-
Heres a bit from The Witcher 3 dev about the xbox1 issues. http://gamingbolt.com/dx12-wont-change-xbox-ones-1080p-issue-but-devs-will-be-able-to-push-more-triangles-witcher-3-dev Also why would Sony support EA access when they have PS now? Playstation rolls out PS now and EA thinks "great idea" lets do EA access instead of jumping onto PS now. Sony said beat it nerd! Me personally, I don't care for either service. But I also think we will see far more of this style of service in the future as they refine the idea. I also see a brighter future with PS now than EA access as the PS now catalog is far larger and will grow. EA access will always have little to nothing to offer, other than "early access" to future titles. To me EA access is an attempt at a pay to demo program.
-
Edited by Jaccub: 8/4/2014 10:29:28 PMYour last statement I can't disagree with. :)
