I watched The Final Cut, which is the most recent version.
Hmm. I liked it a lot, but I don't know how I [i]feel[/i] about it. I feel as though I missed something. Everyone's always talking about whether Deckard is/isn't a replicant, but I didn't even catch that aspect of the film. I payed close attention throughout the movie, but I just didn't catch all the things people talk about. The religious symbolism, the Deckard mystery, nothing. I feel really stupid right now. It doesn't help that I could barely hear Edward James Olmos' character speak, apparently he has some significance. I guess it's a movie you have to watch several times to really "get it."
So, yea. I liked it a lot, but I feel as though I missed all the things people discuss in relation to the film. Am I alone here?
-
I watched it for the first time a few months back It was...alright I don't know It wasn't as good as everyone made it out to be As for your question, Harrison Ford stated that he felt that he character is not a replicate but Ridley Scott stated that he portrayed him as a replicate It was deep for sure Things to note: In the original cut, the rain stops and the dove flies away in clear skies In the original cut, there's a scene after the final scene in the final cut. They drive to a mountainous area and a voiceover explains that Rachel is a special model with no expiration date Harrison Ford and Ridley Scott have very conflicting views on the theme and lore of the story