{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
originally posted in:TFS The Floods Sanctuary
View Entire Topic
Edited by Hipi07:
3/7/2013 5:48:39 PM
32
Worst Decision In Alien 3
After finally having watched the movie, despite knowing the reputation it had and what not, I still wanted to watch the movie for myself and to make my own opinions on it. I owed to myself since I loved Alien and especially Aliens. The worst decision IMO the movie did was killing off Newt and Hicks. The two characters you could most care about in Aliens.
Not the lulzy CGI Alien, nor some of the retarded prisoners, seeing Bishop come back to live for a short moment only to be taken away again, it was the damn lack of Newt and Hicks. I mean I understand the emotional malarkey that it allowed the movie, but c'mon, seriously? Six years after Aliens and they decided to let it go that way?
Goddamn it guys. Way to kill off perfectly good characters in exchange for a wide cast of idiots (although there were some good ones). Even then, I still decently liked the movie. Not necessarily a bad one, but definitely no where on the level of the past two. Now on to watch Resurrection.
Anyways, what did you think of Alien 3 when you saw it? What did you have against it?
-
The first movie was a squad vs one xenomorph The second one was a larger marine squad vs a ton of them I think they should have kept expanding on the size of the threat rather than try to use the same formula of the first one, though instead with characters we don't give a shit about. I mean they literally are criminals, murderers and rapists, why should I care if an xenomorph violently kills them all?
