originally posted in:Secular Sevens
View Entire Topic
[url=http://www.cnn.com/2014/01/15/politics/senate-benghazi-report/]Recent findings from[/url] the Senate Intelligence Committee found that the attack on Benghazi (I'm assuming that this meant the outcome, not physical attack) could have been prevented had the U.S. government taken more precautions. The report partly blamed the State Department, stating that it should have increased its security measures due to warnings that U.S. personnel were at risk. It then went onto to say that the Intelligence Community provided "ample strategic warning" that U.S. facilities were at risk. But condemned them for being able to do more. Had they done "extremist-affiliated social media analysis", then information pointing towards a potential attack against the compound might have been found.
-
Meh. What isn't preventable? Sure, a tragedy happened. Live were lost. Pretty much every event in human history is preventable. Bush had a briefing given to him 2 weeks before 9/11 that was titled: "Osama Bin Laden determined to attack the US using Airplanes." No shit. Had they directed the FAA to act on that, how would the world be different? There was an imminent threat of war in November of 1941. The Roosevelt administration had notice that the Japanese would attack in the Pacific. The analysts thought Manilla was the most likely target, but couldn't rule out Pearl. Imagine if that had been acted on. How is Benghazi a big deal if you don't hat Obama? Comparatively, how many people died? Its a sick math, but how did that day balance against any other random day in the US and the world? Are those diplomat's lives more important than the soldiers who died trying to take Baghdad due to piss poor planning? Why is this still news?