[url=http://www.nationalturk.com/en/redtube-com-warning-ministry-of-justice-keeps-porn-streaming-for-safe-breaking-news-46029]Redtube.com Warning: Ministry of Justice keeps Porn streaming for safe / Breaking News[/url] [quote]Who is streaming, not copied – and not committing copyright infringement. This responds to a request from the Ministry of Justice of the left. In order for the government contradicts prosecutors who warned thousands porn users. What does the federal government of the warnings for porn consumers? The deputies of the Left wanted to know in a little request. In response, the present media, writes the Ministry of Justice, the government considers “not the mere viewing of a video stream for copyright infringement.” Thus, the black – red government is contrary to the legal opinion , which is the Redtube warning letters to thousands of German in December based. And it is positioning itself for the first time so clearly in the great controversy , such as streaming should be treated legally as compared to downloads. The conclusion of the Ministry of Justice : User not infringe copyright when they watch videos in the browser . In terms of content , the assessment of the Ministry of Justice , the 44a to the paragraphs and 53 of the copyright law is based , for experts as no surprise – many share the opinion that video streams in the browser are not to be regarded as pirated copy. But the question have not been clarified conclusively courts in Germany . Also writes the Justice Department to MPs : “Whether the use of streaming offerings constitutes a reproduction , violates the rights of authors and holders of related rights , is however not yet been clarified by the supreme court . ” Ultimately , the question as ” to be decided by the European Court of Justice” . With streaming, no permanent copy of the user is created in contrast to the download. The files are only stored in a temporary data buffer , this caching can , however, provide a copy option . Redtube.com:”Uncertainty remains for citizens” The reasoning of the Abmahnanwälte is therefore: When streaming will create, because the rights holders have not authorized this copy by caching a sort of pirate copy. Some chambers of the Cologne Regional Court had followed the reasoning – and had ensured that thousands of users have been getting warnings in December over 250 euros. Other lawyers argue Streaming is always watching – even when it comes to illegally into the grid Asked videos. Thus, it is not prohibited, other than the reproduction. Clarify Legally not want the Justice Department ‘s assessment , however, apparently . It is true that in the answer : ” The federal government wants the copyright adapt to the needs and challenges of the digital age , taking into account the digital use practices . ” But then directs the Ministry to the existing paragraphs 44a and 53 of the Copyright Law . The left criticizes the politician Halina Wawzyniak , one of the MPs who have submitted the request. ” The coalition should ensure that the paragraph 44a also expressly allows streaming ,” she says . ” Does she not , the uncertainty for citizens remains. ” The concrete Abmahnfall assessed the Ministry in the response not explicitly . However, it refers to the law against rogue business practices of 2013. This also included the case Redtube warning letters , they say. Evaluate going to the law , however, only in 2015. In addition, they wanted to initially not be active.[/quote] Porn is for entirely safe to viewing legal unless pirate. In all seriousness, back when SOPA and PIPA were being discussed it made most people think of YouTube and music sharing sites, but one of the first things I thought of was online porn. Discuss how you view porn sites in regards to copyright material. [spoiler]The translator for this news site really needs to brush up on their English.[/spoiler]