originally posted in:Secular Sevens
View Entire Topic
Everyone belongs to a group, so under anyone's interpretation fascism can benefit them granted their group is at the top. Let's consider Judaism and Zionism. A society where collective Jewish wealth leaves Jews at the top, Zions one level down, and everyone else at the bottom which would create class warfare and thus stimulate the economy, while Jews and Zions will reap the benefits.
It's not unethical. You only need the care about the people around you. It is a lie to say that you care about all the people in the world because you just don't know them. And they certainly don't care anymore for you. This is what communism relies upon for social order, but it will fall apart as soon as the pressure is relieved.
In full, focusing on equality for every group within the human race would only trim down on the resources and power your group could seize for their own. So what redeems communism from its inevitable short standing with Zion fascism?
-
Edited by DeclinedA01: 12/17/2013 7:40:46 PMSocialism inevitably leads to totalitarianism. The [url=http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law]-godwinslaw!-[/url] were socialists. (National Socialist Party, can't say the word). Any system in which property is in the hands of the state will involve some people making arbitrary decisions on who get (or doesn't get) what. To get a better understanding on this subject I highly suggest reading [i]The Road To Serfdom[/i] by F.A. Hayek.