{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/12/2013 4:56:30 AM
1
The statement "homosexuality is unnatural" is arguably an even worse argument against it than the aforementioned rebuttal. Whether homosexuality is natural or not is entirely semantic, and every conclusion you can possibly come to using the various definitions of natural in no way suggests that homosexuality is wrong, unless you also concede that any modern technology is wrong, which I think that we can all agree is stupid.
I'm not sure if you said that it's unnatural and therefore wrong earlier, but yeah.
English
-
Where did I say it's unnatural in this discussion? You're missing my point. Natural, unnatural. That isn't really relevant. The question is, is it [i]right.[/i] you can't use nature to prove something is right in a topic like this, if any. Likewise it can't be disproven with nature. It's all about what you believe and why. If someone believes it is wrong, it does not make them homophobic.
