I wrote this up over at Waypoint in a response. Knowing how critical Bungie.net is, and along with the easy access to threads here, I'd like some critiques and opinions.
UPDATE: [url=http://www.bungie.net/en/Forum/Post?id=62230769&path=1]I overhauled the analysis, addidng more detail and sources and quotes here.[/url]
[quote]Del Rio's position as Captain of the Infinity is the result of a political battle. When ONI commissioned Infinity, it took up half of the Navy's entire budget. You can't hide something like that so the UNSC wanted in on the project too.
Not wanting to let ONI have complete control of the Infinity, the UNSC placed Del Rio as Captain, while ONI wanted Lasky. With Del Rio as captain the UNSC secured two things.
1. The Infinity would not be destroyed easily. Del Rio served as a Captain throughout the Covenant War following the guide book by the letter. As a result, he made calculated retreats, decorating his Service Record with numerous undestroyed ships in good condition.
2. ONI would not have entire control of Infinity. With Del Rio in charge, and Lasky as the XO, the UNSC and ONI effectively shared Infinity.
In the results that lead up to Halo 4, Del Rio would come to understand Infinity's awesome power. This lead him to overestimate it when they were deployed to Requiem in '57. Losing complete control over Infinity with no power, had Del Rio quite shocked and concerned. His understanding of Forerunner technology based on his experiences was that it was mostly inert.
With Infinity crash landed on Requiem, Del Rio was quite afraid he had just cost Humanity their role as top dog in the Orion Arm. So when the Covenant and Didact were fended off, he decided Infinity was already at too much risk and quite defenseless here. He wanted to make a tactical retreat and return more prepared.
So when Humanity's living legend came back from the dead, and started talking about pursuing an aggressive Campaign on Requiem against the Didact, Del Rio was more concerned about Infinity's safety and didn't want Chief to undermine his command.
When Infinity was capable of leaving, and Master Chief was debriefed on the bridge, his story sounded insane. Humanity has once been an Interstellar civilization, capable of contending with the Ecumene, who had then been devolved, and converted into living machines. In addition, his experience sounded more akin to a vision. If you think about that cutscene, it's actually really trippy.
So as Chief continues to push for the campaign on Requiem, Del Rio adamantly says no. This sends the rampant Cortana off and she reveals just how bad she's deteriorated. Rampant AI's are quite capable of killing people or severely injuring them, so Del Rio went by the book and ordered her termination. Master Chief of course intervened, directly disobeying Del Rio's orders and possibly endangering Infinity's crew by keeping a rampant AI aboard the ship. But Master Chief doesn't stop there, he announces that we will continue the campaign on Requiem if Del Rio will not, undermining his authority.
Del Rio, not wanting to lose the living legend or his perceived authority, ordered Master Chief's arrest, to attempt to keep him aboard Infinity. But it was too late.
Chief had already inspired Infinity's crew by his past deeds and his unflinching resolve to meet the Didact's threat head on.[/quote]
-
lol forthencho u rlly tink u can maek sens of 343 grabbage 343 has no stroy hal 4 is bed bed gaem bed
-
I herd he becomes Spartan to get revenge on Mister Chief.
-
Most people over here turn into the hulk when you mention anything about 343i, so you probably wot get many good responses.
-
Edited by Dusty: 10/12/2013 10:56:19 AMAdmirals, your're completely wrong. 3fail3idiocy are terrible at writing characters because they are a terrible studio. They only exist to run the good name of Halo into the ground. Halo 4 is an insult to the legacy of Bungie.
-
Only issue with Del Rio was the voice actor made him seem like a child who didn't get his way.
-
Edited by BritLemon: 10/12/2013 7:19:32 AMHe was still bad character in [u]Halo 4[/u], mainly due to 343's[i] "amazing" [/i]writing skills.
-
Pretty good. It sounds like something the guy who does the narration for the story videos on Waypoint would say. But [i]'57[/i] should be changed to [i]2557[/i]. It's more professional
-
You have better writing skills than 343i's entire crew.
-
Not a bad analysis. Makes me feel a lot better about that weird, pretty awful, encounter.
-
No, 343i put Del Rio in the game because they wanted to destroy Halo.
-
I agree with this. I think Del Rio's point in the game was to represent the strict harsh rules of the U.N.S.C. That John and the other Spartans had to follow for the majority of their lives, and when John said "no Sir" he was starting to break away from that machine aspect of himself and began regain his humanity.
-
So what you're saying is...Master Chief is a jackass? Hehe. Nice post anyways.
-
I actually really liked Del Rio. This all makes since. [quote]Del Rio, not wanting to lose the living legend or his perceived authority, ordered Master Chief's arrest, to attempt to keep him aboard Infinity.[/quote] ...except for this.
-
Chief still should have head butted Del Rio.
-
In all seriousness, nice post. While I'm not necessarily too keen on Rio's character, I absolutely [i]loved[/i] the "No sir" scene.
-
Edited by Hylebos: 10/12/2013 1:12:44 AMYou see, when you dress his character up like that, he definitely sounds like a solid character with solid motivations and redeemable factors. But that's not at all how they portrayed him in the game, which is the crux of the problem, it doesn't matter how much backstory you give a guy, if you portray a character as a weak, insecure, and incompetent douchebag, he's going to come off as a weak, insecure, and incompetent douchebag to anyone who plays the game. Del Rio was terribly written in Halo 4 as a result, and he is largely responsible for the mediocrity of the middle of the campaign.
-
He needs some more development in Halo 5
-
Phenomenal. Well done. Is this just your opinion, or is it true?