I drive stoned a lot. It doesn't impair my driving [b]at all[/b]. I drive the speed limit and am way more patient. I don't mutter do my self about the piece of shits driving around me.

Bullshit it doesn't. Any sort of inebriation impairs hand-eye coordination.

Is that why I can still play my instruments when I'm super duper high? Are you just spewing bullishly scare-tactics that you read in the local paper or have you actually smoked a fatty and home for a drive?

1. Implying that to know whether or not one's driving is impaired while drunk one has to have drunk-driven? 2. Have you even done the research yourself? Clearly you've not so I'll do it for you. http://adai.uw.edu/marijuana/factsheets/driving.htm http://www.washingtonpost.com/cars/pot-smoking-could-affect-driving-for-weeks-researchers-suggest/2013/03/05/1e10733e-85c5-11e2-a80b-3edc779b676f_story.html 3. Marijuana, definitively speaking and objectively so, impairs your reaction time, hand-eye coordination, and short-term memory, all of which are necessary for driving. 4. I'm not against pot in general; I'm for its legalization. I just don't think some potheads should get to drive high and endanger others because they swear they're fine. It's the same exact argument that people give for driving drunk. "No I swear I'm fine." "I never get in an accident when I'm drunk." "I think driving drunk actually makes me a little better." It's all bullshit.

[quote]There are numerous methodological limitations in the studies reviewed above that may account for the great variations and inconsistencies in their findings, which detracts from the likelihood of a clear synthesis of results.[/quote] Burn

Which link did you get that from, if either? Also, that isn't an admission of illegitimacy of the studies, you idiot. It's a disclaimer of fact.