{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
originally posted in:Secular Sevens
8/30/2013 1:22:24 AM
3
That's exactly my point. You can't support one without compromising on the other. If you support the scientific method, you can't simultaneously support something that has no evidence of its existence.
English
-
Scientists believed in things before they were proven to exist. When the earliest scientists said the earth wasn't the center of the universe, they had little proof other than the sun moving.
-
But ya I see your point
-
We have no evidence of existence, it just doesn't make sense how nothing became something same with God too but the way everything somehow works out in the end doesn't make sense, like why didnt humans die off, we smarter, yes but weaker and take longer to grow up
