{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/14/2013 3:26:04 PM
11
Lord of the Rings should have been condensed into one film that went for 2.5 hours at the most.
English
-
That... That's not even possible.
-
Why not? Just cut out all the useless walking.
-
Edited by Y SO REACH BETA: 8/17/2013 12:41:13 PMThere is not 6 hours of walking in the Lord of the Rings films. I can understand cutting some walking, but one movie for the whole series wouldn't fit.
-
>there is not 6 hours of walking Brah, Return of the king had three.
-
dat editing skills!
-
Woah woah woah woah. I think you need to calm down.
-
I was reading these and having a good time, even when I disagreed with things. My mouse flew into the wall when I read yours.
-
That seems a bit impractical. Ralph Bakshi was just barely able to cram the first two books into one film.
-
-
Really?
-
Yeah, I couldn't sit through all the movies. Too boring.
