I have yet to see Into Darkness, but I heard a lot of Trekkies were pissed over it. Was it really that bad?
-
I didn't see the first movie or any episode of Star Trek, but I thought Into Darkness was a good movie. It's not a bad movie from a normal point of view, no idea if the issues were canonical though
-
I loved it. But I'm not a Star-Trek fan.
-
I thought it was actually really good, but Its the only Star Trek i've ever seen
-
It was actually good everyone sees it different based on their point of view of the movie
-
I loved it, but then again I'm not an actual Star Trek fan. I've only watched the two newest movies, but I enjoyed them a lot. So far it's my most favorite movie I've seen this year.
-
too shallow for star trek, more like a star wars movie in the star trek universe.
-
I enjoyed it, but it wasn't as good as the first. The ending didn't upset me at all as it did most others.
-
The first new Star Trek was better. Into Darkness try's too hard to be a remake. I would have preferred something more original.
-
I thought it was great, aside from all the lens flare of course.
-
I was told by a Trekkie that it was awesome.
-
What??? I'm a HUGE Trekkie, and that movie was AMAZING!
-
Into Darkness wasn't that bad.
-
Edited by Nick Saban: 7/21/2013 8:05:19 PMI thought the movie was really good. My mom who was is a Trekkie loved the movie
-
I'm not a Star Trek fan and that movie was -blam!-ing awesome. So much better than what the trailers make it seem.
-
That movie was more appealing to kids with ADHD than Halo 2 was.
-
I haven't seen it, but I've heard it was a good movie.
-
It was a pretty good film. The script was alright, but the acting made up for it, as did the plot
-
I thought it was a pretty awesome movie. "Awesome" granted that the script kind've sucked for it.
-
KAAAAAAAAAHN!