{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/24/2013 3:43:13 AM
2
I'd side with this opinion if it were a medieval game, where you'd actually have to worry about a blunt object going toward your chest. But, since it takes place in the future, where there are guns, it doesn't make sense to have armor anyway. A lot of the time it's more important for things to be easily identifiable than realistic.
It's more interesting to design characters around their gender. It helps them not blend together.
English
-
In the future, you still risk falling and projectiles hitting you. If you're in on a spaceship that's falling apart (see: Mass Effect 2 intro), you can get his by debris. You can end up in hand-to-hand combat with a huge as alien. This is still relevant and necessary, because sci-fi combat isn't a game of chess. You can still make feminine armor without making it a death trap. It's not that hard.
-
See also: the Halo franchise. You'd think diving from outer space is some kind of extreme sports in the future.
