I never played Conviction, which had a noticeably different playstyle. I'm used to the Chaos Theory, Double Agent gameplay. Do you think the quicker-paced killing is better? Or should it remain faithful to the Chaos Theory stealth style?
Also, how do you feel about the Spies vs. Mercs multiplayer? I've only played Double Agent's multiplayer, which was Spies vs. Upsilons. And the spies didn't have guns.......so......yeah.
-
I think it looks cool but I'm holding off on most purchases till the new consoles come out. Even without an announcement they could also release this on the next gen consoles later. I remember Double Agent on both OG Xbox and 360. Would just be PC visuals of course, play exactly the same.
-
No Michael Ironside = No buy
-
I'm going to buy it, while i'm sad about Michael Ironside not being Sam anymore, the new guy still sounds decent and i'm excited for it
-
It appears to be better than Conviction. The 'throwback mode' or whatever they called it seems decent. The multiplayer, at least from the Merc perspective seems like it might be good.
-
Is it coming to Wii U?
-
Conviction was horrible. I'm not even interested in Blacklist.
-
Looks like another shooter
-
Its stupid. Cant take it seriously ever since they released gameplay that was not gameplay.
-
[quote]Or should it remain faithful to the Chaos Theory stealth style?[/quote] Chaos Theory actually deviated from the stealth quite a bit. It added a few features such as the audio levels, but also made it significantly easier (and irrelevant to the score) to just kill everyone in the level. Where stealth was critical in Pandora Tomorrow and the original, it becomes a medium for action in the sequels. Chaos Theory was fantastic, but I'd really like to see a return to stealthiness. Double Agent and Conviction relied far too much on action.