^This is why I think Xbox One's way of dealing with [url=http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2013-05-24-this-is-how-xbox-one-game-trade-ins-will-work-apparently]used games[/url] is a good thing.
[b]More money to the developers, less money to the middle man.[/b]
Edit: And don't say his points are invalid just because he's fat.
-
[quote]More money to the developers, less money to the middle man.[/quote] But that's wrong, the more money will go to the publishers, devs lose out again.
-
Except the publishers get money from the first person who purchased that game. If this video was about GameStop ripping used game sellers off asking $5 for a $60 game, then I would be somewhat supportive. However this guy's argument is just people don't wanna spend an extra $5 (which I don't know how much GameStop sells used games where he lives, but it is usually $15-$20 off where I live so I don't accept that argument) in order to help out the publisher. I can understand wanting to help out the publisher and thank them for their great game, but isn't that their job? Honestly, I think that if it was a truly great game, they would have made a lot more money off of the new copies in the first couple weeks than the few copies that were sold later in the year. Also I don't believe he took into account if that game is off the market and people still wanna play it. How else but used games would someone legally obtain a copy of a game?
-
Well it's Boogie, he has a lot of valid points But my problem with GameStop isn't their methods, nor is it their need to sell GameInformer subscriptions, because that's exaggerated to the nth degree But I despise some of their staff, some of the biggest douchebags work there Don't know a damn thing about games, but work there because its the hip thing to do, pff
-
Holy shit that voice caught me off guard lol So used to his Francis vids.