{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/12/2013 4:14:58 PM
1
If he can kill a -blam!-ton of zombies by himself he was really all they needed to send. They could waste billions sending hundreds of soldiers, or they could just send one really hardcore badass. Which sounds more logical?
English
-
Sending both.
-
Would be impractical and costly. One serious badass would be enough. The rest would be a waste of resources.
-
Too costly? For the presidents daughter?
-
It'd be like using a grenade to kill a swarm of ants when a boot will do the job just as well and with less money thrown away for it.
-
It depends on whether those ants were holding the presidents daughter hostage or not.
-
Oh, man, somebody draw this small discussion, haha.
