{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Pillar Of Awesom:
4/26/2013 4:23:37 PM
1
On Rumours Being Used as Sources
Why do you trust articles from "Gaming journalism" sites which cite "unnamed sources" and "rumours"? From what I can see any site can easily make up rumours and post inflammatory articles in an effort to gather pageviews. We've seen RPS do this before with the Bungie interview.
So why do you still take articles citing rumours as sources as fact? So many people actually believe that always-online for the 720 is confirmed and Destiny will have paid subscription already.
Also, let's have a general discussion about gaming journalism.
-Pillar
-
Because it makes people feel like they're ahead of the curve. The truth is very little leaked information ends up being true compared to the mountainous amounts of tripe thrown around daily...
