{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
4/22/2013 7:07:10 PM
6
Keystone XL pipelne and the Northern Route Approval Act.
What are your thoughts on this Act that would effective tell the president to go screw himself and not require his approval for the pipeline as well as effectively tell environmental activists to go screw themselves as well since it majorly limits lawsuits on it and all lawsuits would need to be approved by the U.S. Court of Appeal for the District of Columbia Circuit.
-
In a cost/benefit analysis, if the costs exceed the benefits, we shouldn't do it. If the benefits exceed the costs, we should do it.
-
1 ReplyTrying to re-engineer the approval process when we're in the middle of the approval process is shady behavior, period.
-
I'm against it.
-
1 Reply[quote]he State Department estimates the current $5.3 billion project will create 42,000 temporary jobs over the one to two year construction period, of which 3,900 will be direct construction jobs[/quote] [url=http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/afp/130415/key-facts-about-the-controversial-keystone-xl-pipeline#9]source[/url] hmmm, dont we need jobs in america right now?
-
Agreed with AGT. I live in PA and don't give half a -blam!-. The pipelines are 1000x safer than transporting it internationally over the water.
-
3 RepliesOpposing the pipeline is dumb.
