So someone on this forum said this (not verbatim). What would you say to him/her?
EDIT: The person I was talking about clarified that he meant Halo 4 and that he quickly edited his post so that it says "Battlefield" instead of "CoD" because he realized that vehicles are quite important in Halo.
-
Depends on what you look at. The gameplay is nothing like battlefield and cod but some of the progression systems are.
-
At its core, Halo 4 plays like Halo. But it's got a lot of CoD gimmicks (like the progression system, custom loadouts and so on) that smother it with generic overtones.
-
Anything before Halo 4 I would disagree with. Halo 4 now? Yes I would agree. 343i has taken steps toward the Call of Duty formula.
-
It's not very similar to COD. It's just taken steps towards it, but it still remains sort of a Halo game, although nothing like what we've come to know and love.
-
Well, now it is.
-
he hasn't played enough pre H4
-
They said that about Halo 4? Sounds right on the money.
-
I would agree with him.
-
Edited by DEZARATH: 4/19/2013 11:34:59 AMI'd say mute an asshole who has to rely on the help of others by asking them to bash a opponent in their stead. Also that is a cheap tatic and petty OP.
-
Edited by Steel Assassin: 4/19/2013 1:37:43 PMMeh. This has been an object of debate for many reasons. I argue, just for the hell of it, [i]all[/i] FPSs copy off of Bungie. Marathon was the first FPS to [b]EVER[/b] have vertical aiming. So, you know, unless the FPS you play doesn't have "up" and "down" they totally copied off of Bungie. Just saying.
-
If they're talking about Halo 4 I'd agree with them. Any other and I'd disagree.
-
Edited by Tartan 118: 4/19/2013 11:59:53 AMDoes one get killed in seconds by standard weapons on standard game modes (i.e. not Rockets, not Binary Rifle, not on SWAT)? No. Is there colour? Yes. Do the weapons have memorable names that aren't a configuration of initials and numbers? Yes. Is there a scifi theme? Yes. Only four basic yet fun and enjoyable ways in which Halo is better. There are many more.
-
I was like, um it is? Until I saw it didn't say halo 4.
-
It seemed that he was talking about Halo in general because the thread was about Halo in general and no one ever mentioned Halo 4.
-
Edited by King Vendrick: 4/19/2013 12:47:56 AMI meant Halo 4 you dumb noob. EDIT: And besides I'm pretty sure I changed that post within 20 seconds to Battlefield instead of CoD.
-
You should correct him. "Halo 4's multiplayer isnt unique and is very similar to CoD"
-
Edited by RogueSPARTAN264: 4/19/2013 2:34:20 AMHalo 4 is. Halo Reach 1/2 is. no other Halo is.
-
I would tell him he is wrong.
-
Well if it's Halo 4 then they're sort of right.
-
Well, I would say they are right->Halo 4.
-
Then I'd slap them and tell them to stop being such an idiot.
-
I would ask him to expound. Making assumptions about his argument before tackling why he is wrong will only result in failure.
-
If it is in reference to halo 4 hell yes I would agree If it is in reference to reach then maybe Anything before that hell no.
-
I would agree since Halo 4.
-
If he's talking about Halo 4 then yes. Reach, I can see where he's coming from. Anything before that is just plain wrong.
-
Try to listen to his points, most likely try to punch him in the neck, the get surgery to have his shoe removed from my rear.