This thread is inspired by another: view original post
Why do people think that the U.S. government would never stage an attack or tragedy of any kind? The U.S. government already has bloody hands. So what is stopping them from staging a tragedy like that in order to further their regime? As long as they don't get caught, they won't get any flak from the people and can use the aftermath of the tragedy to their advantage. Anyone who tries to expose the truth regarding such an event will either be considered a lunatic conspiracy theorist by the general public or will be silenced by the government. The government can do anything to get what they want as long as they don't get caught and their higher ups are willing. So why is it that so many people think that the government would never do such a thing? Why do people think that a government-staged tragedy is such a taboo? They have already done terrible things. The government is not the pure and just operation that many people think it is. Human life isn't as important to the government as most people think.
I am not saying the recent shootings in the U.S. are staged.
I am not saying that 9.1.1 was an inside job.
I am not saying all conspiracy theorists are telling the truth.
I am just saying that the government is very capable and could very much be willing to do such things and thinking that they would stage a tragedy of any kind should not be such a taboo.
-
Edited by PieR0mancer: 3/27/2013 6:14:06 AMBecause they make a lot of assumptions, and ask a lot of questions that don't have specific answers and use that as proof that it was a government cover-up. Besides, if the government was competent enough to pull off something like that, surely they'd quickly silence the people who start to dig into it.
-
Edited by DELIVER ME MEMES: 3/27/2013 6:44:48 AMthey tried to with fast and furious' whistleblowers...tried to make their lives hell to force them to quit so they could be discredited. and if it wasn't a conspiracy, when holder and friends were about to face perjury charges for lying to congress, why was he given "national security" clearance by POTUS? http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/fast-and-furious-katies-pavlich/1108322242
-
you can't explain that... or the fact a rogue undercover FBI informant could have been the person to murder Agent Terry since eyewitness report a 3rd gun at the scene yet official reports mention only two, and they were using infiltrators to investigate the cartels.
-
-