originally posted in:TFS The Floods Sanctuary
[url=http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18fumyc3mbvhfjpg/original.jpg]Sauce.[/url]
Anyone else find her totally. . . underwhelming? She's cute, but Mary Jane is supposed to be gorgeous. I think this comment from that article says it better than I could:[quote]She looks sort of like a real person; like pretty, but also sort of plain.
I always feel like Mary Jane needs to be some leggy super-modle with giant breasts, but I appreciate why directors want to veer away from that.
Still, it's funny. In most movies, normal-girl characters are played by super-hot models with ample bosoms, and with Mary Jane they have a built-in excuse for pure teenaged-boy T & A fan-service, and they sidestep it entirely.[/quote]
Agree, or is this new direction for MJ a welcome change?
-
Should have got Christina Hendricks.
-
I came in this thread expecting completely different subject matter.
-
-
Better Mary Jane
-
OP found the worst picture of her on the internet. Shailene Woodley is hawt.
-
Oh, THAT Mary Jane... She's cute. I tend to find cute more attractive than the model types. Don't know that I need to watch anything involving Spiderman anytime soon though.
-
I think she is kinda ugly... She looks like a boy!
-
Title is misleading.
-
The New York Mary Jane.
-
Honestly, I don't think she's even cute. She has a strange neck. Although it could just be a bad photo, but still. She's not the person that should be playing Mary Jane.
-
They should have used Hayley Williams.
-
Edited by Felicia402: 2/27/2013 3:44:16 AMSeen this a nice while ago now and it's safe to say I was rather disappointed. Don't get me wrong, she's pretty in a more average, cute, girl next door kind of way but not the Mary Jane I've always been a fan of. My biggest disappointment is the fact she looks so damn young compared to Emma Stone. They're both going to be love interests however this chick looks so inferior to Stone, there shouldn't be any competition. What I believe is that they were aiming for this newer [url=http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/9f/Mary_Jane_Circle_Of_Friends.jpg]girl next door Mary Jane.[/url] If so they hit spot on, but that's not the Mary Jane I've grown up with. I've always known her as this sexy, cat like, sassy chick and was hands down (imo) the hotter of the three love interests. [url=http://www.samruby.com/Spiderverse/MaryJane/MaryJaneWatsonSit.gif]This is the Mary Jane I prefer.[/url] Kirsten Dunst actually wasn't that bad as MJ, appearance wise. However she wasn't as sexy and confident as I always pictured MJ to be. Well at least we still have Emma Stone and (apparently playing Black Cat) Felicity Jones. It's too bad they're completely going to overshadow Mary Jane, at least I think they will.
-
she fugly man chin
-
Edited by HurtfulTurkey: 2/27/2013 6:15:12 AMAnd actually in makeup... Yeah, she's gorgeous.
-
Not that picture, no way. Other pictures in the thread portray her much better.
-
she aight
-
Edited by Cultmeister: 2/27/2013 10:24:51 AMis it just me or has she got a really fat neck? OT: tbh, Peter Parker's supposed to be a nerd yet he's a supercute guy in this version so it kinda evens things out i suppose.
-
Edited by Owned Maybe: 2/27/2013 8:09:20 AMFor someone who isn't wearing any makeup, she looks pretty good. I doubt any of those shots are of them shooting for the film, unless this is one of the few movies where they don't use makeup, which I highly doubt. They probably just haven't applied any makeup yet.
-
she looks like my friend's little brother with tits. Just a little weirded out by this woman.
-
The spiderman movies still aren't over?
-
She has a man's neck.
-
With or without makeup she is not attractive, at all.
-
Edited by Leukocyte: 2/27/2013 6:17:25 AMNot going to lie, thought this was a drug thread. She seems too plain.
-
What the HELL is that? She's hideous. New spiderman confirmed for 2/10 would not watch.
-
I thought Emma Stone was the new Mary Jane? Are they doing ANOTHER Spiderman reboot?
-
She will always be hot in my mind.