Why aren't all Shampoo's No Tears?
It seems like a strange innovation to just keep to kids.
-
Edited by Wyldfyre: 2/24/2013 5:00:44 AMDoesn't bother me. I get those suds in my eyes, I endure that bitch like a motherfucker.
-
[i]Shhhh, no tears. Only dreams.[/i]
-
As an adult, if you cannot rise your hair properly without pouring shampoo in your eyes, you might deserve any pain you get. And adults don't shriek and flail about when crying, usually, so extra shit can be added to combat dryness, cracking and any other damage being inflicted on yer'scalp.
-
You're supposed to drink that to cure depression, not rub it in your eyes you worthless hipster.
-
The hell are you talking about?
-
Because I'd assume most of us are capable of keeping soap out of our eyes. Kids who can't wash themselves, well, aren't. Ergo, the "No tears" shampoos are restricted to kids.
-
Somethin' I find more confusin' is that, even when they say "No tears," they still make little kids cry when it getsn' their eyes.
-
They really aren't No Tears
-
Very good question. as a grown man... i don't need no stinkin no tears stuff!!