{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/17/2013 4:16:21 PM
1
Funny enough, that post does link a set of armor that has a place for her boobs, as it should. Because if it doesn't, it's either going to press them into your chest - creating problems, or it's going to be loose around your stomach - creating problems.
It doesn't have the indent in the middle, but it does have a protruding section for her chest.
But then with the dent in the middle, you're just getting into artistic freedom. (Because kratos from god of war has totally battle-ready armor)
English
-
I do not understand the humor. Above the image you link it says "GREAT EXAMPLE OF FANTASY TORSO ARMOR THAT IS FEMININE BUT FUNCTIONAL:"
-
Because everyone is saying that having a space for her chest cut out is absolutely crazy and nonsensical. And it clearly is the case with that image. That article you linked argues the indent between a woman's boobs is bad, but a hollow cavity for them is definitely a must for comfort and functionality.
-
I think we're arguing the same thing and I misunderstood. Sorry.
