{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
This thread is inspired by another: view original post
Edited by dazarobbo:
2/12/2013 6:46:35 AM
4
Democrats actually fund more science programs (pointless politicking)
Under Kennedy/LBJ and Clinton, [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budget_of_NASA#Annual_budget.2C_1958-2012]NASA's budget has skyrocketed[/url]. If you collectively add up the spending since NASA's creation, democratic presidents have spent more in science than republicans. I just wanted to make this clear.
Furthermore, only 6% of scientists today are republican. Keep in mind this number includes [url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/06/paul-broun-evolution-big-bang_n_1944808.html]these people[/url].
Lastly I would just like to point out that, despite my thread, people shouldn't be fighting a republican vs democrat internet war, but rather should voice opinions on certain issues and laws, so at the end of the day, we are not a bunch of brainwashed kids arguing towards a specific group.
-
3 RepliesBumping so people know the truth and don't buy into Twisted Love's lies.
-
1 ReplyPoliticians should never ever talk about science. They're good at talking, not at working out formulas and experimentation.
-
1 Reply>implying all science funding goes to NASA's budget
-
4 RepliesThis was entirely obvious and it certainly didn't need it's own thread. I mean a party which tries to get intelligent design taught, evolution removed that that vaginas can repel sperm depending on teh circumstances on HOW that sperm got in there (a.k.a r@pe) certainly isn't very pro science, is it?
