[url]http://gawker.com/5978597/catholic-hospital-chain-kills-wrongful-death-lawsuit-by-arguing-that-a-fetus-is-not-a-person[/url]
Background info:
[quote]A major Catholic health provider has successfully dismantled a wrongful death lawsuit brought against it by arguing — in defiance of its own long-held doctrine — that a dead fetus is not the same as a dead person.
The case involves the 2006 death of 31-year-old Lori Stodghill, a woman seven months pregnant with twin boys, who was brought in to the emergency room at St. Thomas More Hospital in Cañon City, Colorado, on New Year's Day.
According to her husband Jeremy, Lori was vomiting and had shortness of breath — symptoms that would later be attributed to the clogged artery that caused her untimely demise.
After he parked the car, Jeremy returned to the ER to find Lori unconscious. Less than an hour later she would be dead of a massive heart attack, and her twins would die with her.
But Jeremy maintains that it didn't have to end this way.
Despite being paged by the hospital, Dr. Pelham Staples, the on-call obstetrician (who also happened to be Lori's personal obstetrician), never arrived. Instead, he spoke with Jeremy by phone.
"He said, 'Well, what do you want to do? Take the babies? Take the babies?" Jeremy recalled to Westword. "I kept responding, 'I'm not a doctor!'"
ER staff, meanwhile, were unable to detect any fetal heartbeats, and the decision to perform a perimortem Cesarean section fell to doctors at the scene, who decided against it.
A short while later Jeremy, who believes the Cesarean section might have saved his twins, filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the faith-based nonprofit which operates St. Thomas More.[/quote]
Catholic Health Initiative abandons Catholic principles, ethics, morals, etc.:
[quote][Catholic Health Initiative] claims to follow the tenets of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops' Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care, which clearly state that "The Church's defense of life encompasses the unborn."
But when push came to shove, CHI abandoned their beliefs in order to win a malpractice lawsuit.
CHI's lawyer, Jason Langley, successfully convinced both the Fremont County District Court and the Colorado Court of Appeals to throw out Jeremy's lawsuit on the basis that CHI can not be sued for the wrongful death of a fetus, because it is not a person.[/quote]
Thoughts on the suit in general? Should it have been a wrongful death suit?
Thoughts on the situation of the church turning on its fundamental ideals? Do any Catholics think this is justified and within the bounds of Catholic ethics and morals? If so, how so?
-
I think its less of a moral thing and more about a legal ploy. Not sure if it should have been a wrongful death suit but whatever....
-
I think it's positively necro!
-
When the almighty Dollar is on the line, looks like even your beliefs can change to save it. Damn shame.
-
I can't fault them for protecting themselves from a wrongful death suit. I hate lawsuits more than I hate religious 180s.
-
When it suits them, a fetus isnt a person, how cute, and very christian of them.
-
Oh, this is guna be good.
-
Everything on the news now is about Colorado, what happened to our state?!
-
They're basing that on the legal definition of the term, not the Catholic church's definition. Keep in mind that very same legal definition used to exclude children, women, and people that weren't white.
-
"WE ARE RIGHT AND ANYONE WHO DISAGREES WITH US ARE MORALLY EVIL. Untill we -blam!- up, then you're right"
-
Thankfully, they aren't. Unfortunately that stupid belief (to which they even went back on to save their asses) killed a woman.
-
Edited by A 3 Legged Goat: 1/26/2013 7:08:35 AM7 months would have been too early for the twins
-
I don't respect Catholic ideals.
-
My thoughts on it are that it's a shame they are turning on their beliefs to prevent possible loss. But I also think the suit was wrong, and they should have been able to win the suit without resorting to such drastic measures. No Catholics should think it was justified, and no it wasn't within the bounds of Catholic ethics and morals. There are some details I would like to know about it, such as who specifically might have made the decision to turn on their beliefs.
-
I'm okay with this, mostly because I think it's funny when people get desperate enough to turn on their own ideals. As for the case? I wouldn't care who won it either way, I got my humor out of the story. :P
-
Well isn't that convenient...
-
Edited by The Great DanTej: 1/26/2013 6:51:25 AMThat's down right repugnant. (That they would go to such a length just to deny a widower justice.)