{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
originally posted in:Mjolnir Battle Tactics
View Entire Topic
Edited by il Suns li:
1/17/2013 1:22:23 AM
32
What would you change in Halo 4 to make it better?
Everyone talks about how bad/meh Halo 4 is, and I tend to disagree, as someone who hated Reach I thoroughly enjoy Halo 4.
Yet of course everyone hopes for Halo 5, but I don't exactly see what would be changed to make it better. The maps? Playlists? Maybe the weapons?
I'd like to hear some opinions, because honestly I don't think Halo 5 will differ much from Halo 4, regardless of what 343 has or will say.
-
While the maps are quite a bit better than Reaches, I still have to say that it is where we are lacking. Looking back at old Halo 2 and Halo 3 montages, the maps in those games are unparallelled. What ever happened to such great map design as these? If Halo 4 had a playlist composing of only Halo 3 maps and Halo 3 gameplay, that is all I would play. Also, what kept people driven to play was reaching that ultimate rank of 50. Everyone always wanted to play ranked so they could reach a higher rank. In Reach and Halo 4, there is no incentive to play more other than to have fun. The way I have the most fun in games like this is through competitive gameplay, and Halo 4's gameplay isn't super competitive.
