I may be in the minority here, but I enjoy conversing and debating with fellow Guardians. Although we all play the same game, we do not all share the same experiences, and seeing the game through a new lens is quite enlightening. I feel the biggest issue with parties when conversing is when Person A is presenting [b]anecdotal[/b] evidence as [b]empirical[/b] evidence (i.e. - "Me and everyone I know feels [insert random thing here]"). Once data is brought into the fray, tensions can rise and people can lose sight of what the topic of the conversation is/was. Another issue is, and without insult to the greater community, reading comprehension. It reminds me of a meme about a Twitter/X post where someone said, "I love waffles", and a response that post was, "Oh, so you hate pancakes?". That highlights how quickly parties can be on opposing sides in an instant, versus having a healthy dialogue to understand more about the post. Additionally, when people begin discounting someone's experience where disagreements can reach a melting point, because many people don't know how to disengage healthily from a conversation. That's why many times if I find myself and an OP at different points in the conversation, I'll just say "We'll have to agree to disagree. Eyes up Guardian!". Sometimes just acknowledging our differences respectfully is enough.