{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/15/2024 11:48:27 AM
5
If Gambit showed me anything this week, then it is that M/K still has way too much range-accuracy ratio than controller.
What is this BS? A M/K player can hit you pinpoint perfectly at twice the range than a controller player can, simply due to the differences in recoil and flinch behavior.
How is that supposed to be fair? No aim assistance and bullet magnetism in the world will help a controller player against a PC playing having more consistent accuracy on range.
That's like trying to snipe someone with a shotgun on the head with all pellets on 100m range. Literally unfair conditions.
-
Edited by Seki: 7/16/2024 7:24:10 AMYou actively choosing hardware that is not fitting the core style of the game genre (swift and precise aim) already gets heavily compensated by software doing the work for you. But obviously the situation is unfairly stacked against you. Because the machine isn't playing the game enough for you.
