{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/5/2024 11:42:14 AM
1
Biological gender is limited to Male and Female. Anything outside of those two categories is naturally a mutation. It is Binary. You can’t account for mutations much like how you can’t account for outliers within a data set.
English
-
"it's binary and only these two but also there's these things outside of it, but it's still binary bro!!!" also yes you can account for outliers that's a good percentage of what you learn in statistics and data gathering
-
Those mutations I talked about often cause more harm than good. In all considerations, they should not be treated as a standard. This, coupled with the fact that they are quite rare is why I called them outliers. As such, these harmful mutations should not be taken into account when dealing with Biological Gender. I am not talking about the social construct or the way one person may perceive themselves. I am talking about biology, and acting like what I say is false, is for lack of a better term, ignorant and foolish. Furthermore, you do not have to mock me or treat me like an idiot because I had an argument that went against your opinion. An argument, that is based within biology.
