{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/1/2024 8:05:53 AM
6
The human body -whether by randomness or design, it doesn't matter- is built solely for reproduction.
The entire purpose of 'love' is to be a lure for procreation. Every single thing a person does from exercising to brushing their hair to the clothes they wear is subconsciously based on attracting a mate to reproduce. We wouldn't have genitals otherwise. If reproduction didn't exist, neither would love.
If gay -blam!- was natural the human body would be built for it. It isn't.
The ONLY part of a human body built to have a male body part inserted into it is female genitals which leads to the reproductive system. Nothing else.
This is an undeniable fact of nature.
English
-
Make a list of all the things you do that aren’t natural. How many things do you engage with that are purely for comfort or pleasure? I don’t agree that love only exists for reproduction. If we lived forever and never needed to reproduce, we’d still have love for family, friendship, hobbies, etc — so why not romance? Gay attraction is not chosen. It happens naturally in a percentage of the population — it comes from nature. Even if you view reproduction as some form of perfection, nature routinely produces things that deviate from perfection. Nature is imperfect.
-
Edited by SnakeEyes734: 7/2/2024 8:52:09 AMYes but logic is not how these people think.....it's how they FEEL. * Side note: Do animals have more than 2 uh....types as well now? I am really concerned about my dog....
-
I had a dog that kept humping my boys leg, obviously identified as human and a M.A.P. Should have called the police now I think about it.
-
Well no. That would depend on the reason for the design, if designed. But assuming we live in reality and evolution is still real, clearly everything we do isn't always directly for reproduction. Like people enjoying licking toes, feeding women until they can't move, or taking a finger up the back entrance. Let's ignore all those under the blanket term "whatever gets it up moves the needle in the child bearing direction", we also see gay behaviour in animals, both other apes and more distantly related animals. How does this factor in?
-
Simply because other animals in very small percentages exhibit the characteristics doesn’t make it natural. Some animals cannibalism each other.
-
Okay, so the issue is we are working with different definitions of the word natural. I'm happy to go with yours, if you want to define it the way you mean it? It's very small percentages in humans as well, of course.
