{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/26/2024 11:31:46 AM
285
ENOUGH WITH THE LOVE STORY BETWEEN SAINT AND OSIRIS
-
Hearing Saint talking about having enough fists for the enemy is even more cringe. 😂
-
It’s pretty meh.
-
1 ReplyI hope Act 3 we see both of them die. Saint goes nuts due to Corruption.. Osiris tried to bring him back by talking and gets in close .. for Saint to then Impale him his fist. Saint then pretty much overloads himself and dies.
-
Well to be honest I’m in love with that pulse rifle in the raid. Can someone help me hook up?
-
I'm just waiting to see if simulated Saint is gonna turn into a Vex or not later on during the seaso- er episode, because the twist this week was wild, it's true that we did indeed go in the Infinite Forest and save a Saint-14 from a simulated timeline and later helped him in his early days fight against the Eliksni in another It's weird that nobody around the guardian thought about that, Osiris knew though...but kept it from Saint, that he's a copy not the real deal (lays put to rest by Vex in a tomb if you played Curse of Osiris DLC you see it through a door, same door in Well of Flame on Nessus used) which is messed up because he kept that info from him...but the Vex know, the "Conductor" knows. Wonder what Vex would Saint turn into, maybe a giant Minotaur Gatelord frame?
-
3 RepliesCriticising their LGBT inclusion? Get banned
-
2 RepliesBecause partner relationships in Destiny have historically been uncommon and without much detail to speak of....in context it's reasonable to ask - why now? This relationship has been played up like no other in franchise history. Clearly, there's intent. It's for you to decide what the intent is. I didn't think much of it in terms of how two characters relate.... but it's also easy to see the tie to social commentary / statement channeled through Trials (the single most controversial / battle embroiled mode in the game for a decade) - one that would challenge a segment of the base. Clearly, it's not coincidence this storyline is unfolding in June. It's also clear that discussion on this board was not only anticipated, but encouraged. Within the bigger social picture, it's Bungle prerogative to play more of this type role via Destiny. I don't believe it to be a divisive measure. As in the rest of life...it's about understanding and accepting people, most particularly when they live differently than you do. This applies to much more than just intimate attraction, but as an ever present commonality it's as good a mantle as any to carry the point. Sincerely, One who acknowledges the human condition for what it is.
-
What would be nice is a drama free storyline. You know how you can skip the cutscenes, make it so you can skip the blah, blah, blah, between Drifter, Eris, Devrim, etc. And just get on with the game. Also, I feel that when Osiris starts talking I have time to go wash my truck, mow the lawn, go grocery shopping and still have just enough time to clean the chimney. Lol. Be good all.
-
Edited by DaNegativeOne: 6/26/2024 4:55:40 PMI'M NOT ALONE!!! It just feels forced into EVERYTHING! I swear they do it just to showcase how pro-LGBTQ+ they are. Not that I'm not, because I am, but nobody cares. They go on and on and on and on and on... [spoiler]...and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on about it.[/spoiler]
-
Agreed
-
Kinda over it as well.
-
Agree.. its cringy af and doesn’t make any sense at all
-
Agree, it's stupid
-
11 RepliesThe last thing I want to see is an octogenarian have space romance with a russian toaster. This agenda is a little disturbing. Its a shame that I have to mute the tv and go do something else for ever how long these bravo sierra scenes. Bungie, im not watching this garbage. I just want to play, please keep all of your political stuff out of the game and let us PLAY without ANY agenda. flame away Thank you. edit: Add and don't give me that love crap because if that's the case then why is it optional in even mass effect but here we HAVE to have this agenda front and center I wanna kill space aliens, not live out days of our lives with the role of hopeless romantics played by self interests.
-
27 RepliesThey have no chemistry, so why tf are the pushing it so hard. They would never be a couple. I’m not against gays, my uncle is gay and very flamboyant and I love him to death. But why do we need to kill the writing to push the agenda? It’s just so stupid. Bungie pushes their wokeness, and in turn makes the story bad due to the lack of chemistry or whatnot. But oh no, you can’t say it’s a bad addition to the story, or else everyone will call you a bigot and say you don’t like it because they’re gays. That’s just not the case. Word of advice Bungie: adding more LGBTQ+ characters/relationships doesn’t equate to good writing, and trying to shove your agenda down our throats is a bad idea.
-
4 RepliesHad a duds join my raid group the other day and asked for she/they pronouns. Did not bode well as I said my pronoun was to be -blam!-. Video games are not the place people.
-
5 RepliesI can understand that Bungie is trying to show diversity, but jeez louise, why do you gotta drown us on these gay love stories.Give us diversity in the types of love stories
-
3 RepliesReal question. How do they even do the…. you know? The nasty 😅
-
I just find it weird I can hear people's love story but I still can't hear the full Destiny 2 story in 2024. I had never heard of Saint until this episode, or at the least forgot he existed bc I've no history with him. Osiris has a voice like sandpaper so I skip anything he says or take off my headphones when he's talking. So while I don't care one way or another about the generic forced inclusion vs. promoting diversity argument. I simply don't care bc I still have no idea what is happening bc I can't play the beginning half of the game. But sure new old guy and Mr. Sandpaper have an epic unhealthy relationship built on denying each other happiness while they do anything but spend time together? All right then
-
Zombies loving other zombies remember. All guardians are dead. So we know they “love” before we know if they need to eat, drink, sleep, piss, -blam!-, cry. Just to pander to demographics.
-
Not a single love story in the game. Ever. Yet we get this crap forced on to us.
-
Edited by Reith: 6/27/2024 1:20:29 AMGet rid of it all, straight, gay, pan,trans,cis, etc.... I mean andriods and human? Hate to be the human at intimate night. Ouch!
-
5 RepliesHonestly, I kinda still wish they had the brotherly relationship. It was unique and we don’t get that kind of relationship in the game currently
-
For me the Osiris-Saint relationship makes no sense.. I have a hard time believing that these two are romantically linked to each other. That cut scene where they held hands in the spaceship was total cringe. An old retired couple sells the house and buys a motor home and sets off on a long roadtrip. Ya okay. Whatever.
-
1 ReplyEdited by An Engram Full Of Bees: 6/26/2024 4:47:28 PM
An Engram Full Of Beesopen me. - old
I like the diversity, and I think it makes perfect sense sense for there to be different kinds of relationships in a far future setting. But as someone else said, the fact that there’s been comparatively zero effort put into explaining the background and context of Saint and Osiris’ relationship is the main issue here. People cite political agendas and all that jazz, but I firmly believe that most players would gladly accept the Osiris/Saint relationship if it had more legitimate and natural development, rather than being forced. -
I agree. We get it bungie.
