-
Icebreaker has been datamined but the theory is it's gonna be front & centre of the 10th anniversary bundle in September. Unless they're that desperate they've pulled it forward
-
Ok, didn’t know about the 10th anniversary bundle. Thanks
-
Edited by i ♡ Bounties: 3/30/2024 7:29:24 PM
-
Sounds about right 👍
-
Pocket Infinity. LOL
-
If I'm not mistaken, that was the first ever gun nerfed
-
-
People would have a whole fit if pocket infinity came back 😂
-
I think even Bungie is afraid to bring Pocket Infinity back considering that it never returned in Destiny 1.
-
Funny story about that back in d1 it was awhile after the taken king came out. I'm in crucible getting destroyed (story of my life) anyway I pulled out my pocket infinity I was kinda god like then. So after the match I get a message telling me I'm reported for cheating for having a rapid fire fusion. I was laughing so hard, poor taken tots lol
-
Even back in D1 people lost their minds when they lost out to a fusion rifle. Somethings never change
-
You're right man, remember all of the "nerf fusion rifle" post's lol.
-
Right. LOL
-
People can barely handle AR's imagine a rapid fire fusion, man the forums would light up.
-
Edited by jhermannITJ: 3/28/2024 12:17:26 AMI think it's related to Siviks. And one the main focuses are Armory weapons. And he researched Black Armory weapons specifically prototypes from Niobe Labs. AND... it's probably inside the black blob in the room with triple black. I bet you it's all connected. It could be Icebreaker, here's the grimoire lore card for the weapon: [i]"The Ice Breaker series was a clandestine project developed by the Vanguard in conjunction with various City weapons foundries. Meant as an exploration of Golden Age weapon technology, the project was scrapped after only a single weapon reached the testing phase. The prototypes for the project's lone weapon are considered dangerous and unfit for field duty by the Vanguard. This hasn't stopped daring Guardians from seeking out the Ice Breakers - death, after all, is an occupational hazard."[/i]